Mikleo | Luzrov Rulay (
nerdeology) wrote2016-01-19 11:57 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
IC Communication
Use this to get in contact with Mikleo outside of the community posts.

action | voice | text | video
"This is Mikleo. I'll get back to you when I can."

action | voice | text | video
"This is Mikleo. I'll get back to you when I can."
voice
[Which is... an extremely short version of the conversation, admittedly, but that's the gist of it. Mostly.]
voice
voice
[Sorey should not be allowed alone in the marketplace, ever.]
voice
voice
Re: voice
voice
[Well, if it's just jerky...]
It's fine, then, as long as you don't let him sucker you into buying something else later.
voice
voice
All I'm saying is that you make yourself an easy target.
voice
voice
Full price isn't the same as an unfair price, Sorey. Remember when Rose said a thousand gald was too low an amount to trade for Gramps' pipe? And how she insisted on paying you more for it later? She's ruthless, but she's fair. Plenty of people would take the pipe and run with it. That's the difference.
voice
voice
Re: voice
voice
[Remember how people keep calling them sheltered? Yeeeep.]
voice
voice
Fair market value is important. If they don't know that much, they're not good at their job.
voice
voice
If he couldn't make ends meet selling at the price I'd asked for, he wouldn't have negotiated, and he wouldn't have agreed to the sale. It's unusual for a merchant to sell non-perishable goods at a loss.
You know I didn't threatened him to get a better deal, right?
voice
voice
voice
voice
I'm hanging up.
[Just get over here, ugh. And don't bring your puns.]
voice >> action
[Sorey swaggers up twenty minutes later with that bag of beads Mikleo requested, setting them on the book Mikleo's perusing and sitting on the edge of the desk, awfully pleased with himself for a guy who had to put his boyfriend on the phone because he doesn't know how to tell a shopkeeper 'no.'] Still trying to figure out what that passage means, huh?
action
It keeps bothering me. I still don't think it's metaphorical, but it can't possibly be entirely literal, either. It's too absurd.
action
action
action
action
Re: action
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)